Feature Img
Oxfam's alliance on Economic Justice called climate criminals to account in a prototype climate court at a Dhaka conference in November. Photograph: CSRL
Oxfam's alliance on Economic Justice called climate criminals to account in a prototype climate court at a Dhaka conference in November. Photograph: CSRL

As the latest UN climate change summit comes to an end in Cancun, Mexico, there is a feeling of optimism towards an agreement of a new fair climate fund to help poorer countries deal with a changing climate. However, progress is still desperately needed to ensure that crucial decisions are made on how to raise this money as well as setting targets for countries to reduce their carbon emissions.

For many of us in the UK, the year has been business as usual. But there have been many reminders that for every year we fail to take action on climate change, the problem is getting worse for millions around the world. The unprecedented flooding in Pakistan and major food crisis in the Sahel region of Africa were stark warnings that it will get harder and harder for the people on the front line of climate change. I saw at firsthand how climate change is having an impact on the coastal fishing communities of Bangladesh when I returned last month to my country of birth.

Attending a “climate tribunal” organised by Oxfam and attended by climate scientists, lawyers, and governmental and political observers from both the UK and Bangladesh, I heard from women such as Mumtaz Begum. Married to a fisherman, Mumtaz remembers well the day in 1999 that her world turned upside down – as she received the news that her husband’s boat had capsized in a sudden storm. ‘It was a gloomy day, I asked him not to go, but he never listened’ she told us. He never returned home. When in 2007 her mother also died in cyclone Sidr, she was left barely able to provide for her four children by doing domestic work in the village. We also heard from parents mourning the loss of sons, survivours who are now staddled with debt from the boats they bought only to be wrecked by the increasingly rough seas, and even a fisherman who spent several years in an Indian jail after being blown into foreign waters.

Of course fishing has never been without its risks, but evidence from climate scientists attested that the Bay of Bengal was experiencing increased sea surface temperatures leading to sudden rough seas, storms and tidal surges – all as a consequence of climate change. The evidence caused the tribunal to say that the suffering of the coastal fishers’ community of Bangladesh is the “direct consequence of climate change”; and that the government of Bangladesh is required to help its people rehabilitate and adapt to its effects. 

Crucially, the tribunal also said that the rich, industrialised countries have responsibility for climate change and therefore the sufferings of the victims. This is an important argument because it helps us understand why the issue of climate finance is such an important one for international climate negotiations like those that took place in Cancun. 

Climate finance is quite simply the transfer of wealth from rich countries to developing countries to help them cope with the effects of a changing climate. It cannot only pay for mitigation schemes to help these economies develop in a low carbon way but also for adaptation schemes so that communities affected by a changing climate, such as the coastal communities of Bangladesh, can invest in new livelihoods and protect themselves.  Agreeing on the issue of climate finance – working out where the money will come from and how it will be governed – is the key to moving forward on a global climate deal.

As a Shadow Minister for International Development, I am pleased to see that the UK Government has said it will honour our international aid commitment to spend 0.7 percent of GNI as aid – and I intend to press for this promise to be kept.  However what was made evidently clear from my experiences in Bangladesh is that climate finance must be seperate from aid. It is not a gift to developing countries and it is not simply a moral duty or charity. Instead it is an entitlement for poor people who are suffering from the effects of the climate change they largely did not cause.  This is why it is so important that the climate finance that the UK provides is genuinely new money – additional to our 0.7 percent commitments.  Under the last Labour Government, we were committed to ensuring that no more than 10 percent of the aid budget was allocated to climate change finance and this pledge must be maintained. Even at a time of austerity at home this is possible without extra burden on the taxpayer if innovative sources can be found and an international commitment. Indeed, I raised this issue with the Secretary of State for International Development in Parliament before the start of the summit.

It was hard to hear Mumtaz’s story, but it will be even harder to hear of more women widowed in the future as another year goes by without action. Developed countries like the UK need to take a leadership role in the fight against climate change and ensure we see real action. We have to stop the situation getting worse, and so emissions reductions are vital.  But we also have to meet our responsibilities now to the world’s most vulnerable people, and so the issue of providing new and additional climate finance must be top of the agenda.


Rushanara Ali, is a Bangladesh-born British MP, House of Commons, British Parliament and Shadow Minister for International Development.

4 Responses to “Cancun summit, a Bangladeshi Mumtaz and what should we do?”

  1. shahid

    I don’t understand why UK should pay its price to poor people who’re affected by climate change caused by various developed countries whereas UK single-handely and directly made millions of people poor and didn’t pay back (1757-1947). obviously , they’ll donate some only for much bigger benefits.

  2. M.O.Gani, Bangla Town

    Rich countries can help developing nations like Bangladesh to tackle effects of climate changes. They must assist poor countries by developing and transferring technology on renewable energies. British government’s assistance to Bangladesh on renewable energy is pitifully low.

  3. Sirajul Islam

    Thank you ma’m for your write-up, and telling us what your government is doing at present, and what you could do in future, perhaps. It is, however, disheartening to know that climate actions so far built up seems left its own conclusions. If it allow its goals to be shaped by what is feasible in an industrial and consumer economy then it has perhaps failed. Not only climate change but climate change together with population growth continues to grow like this, in roughly fifty years, humankind will be in peril.

    This means that majority of people could soon be wiped out by floods, draughts, war, and of course, without enough food or water. The floods and droughts that have come with climate change are wreaking havoc. Changes in rain patterns and temperature could diminish world’s agricultural output by a huge percent by the end of the century. What’s more, population increases will soon cause our farmers to run out of land. The amount of arable land per person is declining to about a third of an acre by 2050, according to the United Nations. With climatic shocks, and billions more people on the way, the earth will no longer be a sustainable place to live in.

    What is the solution? We’ll be waiting to see what the world can do with aid and fund.

  4. palash

    Very well written Rushanara Ali. Climate change has little impact on Western countries and they can sustain as they are rich but the countries like Bangladesh, Nepal or Maldives neither they have resources to protect them from this disaster nor can they avoid natural disasters. One part of the world cannot be rich and become richer by emitting carbon-di-oxide and pushing the poor of other parts of the world towards the edge. Climate change cannot be contained by donating some dollars to poor nation as it is produced from pollution. We hope the Western world finds a solution to reducing green house effect and make the world livable for all.

Comments are closed.